|
I believe in certain tools matching certain jobs and I think the rationale of a 35mm RF is that its smallish and paints with a certain quality. When I boil it all down for me, my RF is in my pocket, with me when I go socialising and ready -ready for candid and PJ shots, and mainly interior shots at that. <br /><br />Some jobs require a big camera set up. Sport journalism especially. Some jobs require specialist systems such as ringflash/macro capabilities. Some cams are for studio work; skin-tone-uber-alles... These tools I have but they are uncomfortable to use around city streets and in clubs; its not their job. <br /><br />I should mention that I'm rather anal about theft and have spent evenings inside a venue worrying about whether my car was being broken into. This is because in 2006 my car was actually broken into 3 times (and the last occasion they also drove the vehicle down the road a ways). I was mostly lucky although on one occasion non-camera items worth $2500 were stolen. I will attempt to avoid Leica M8 and Noctilux bling for that reason, although I don't deny those pricey items would fit inside a jacket just the same as a R4 and a russian lens. <br /><br />....and sometimes you want the camera to be un-obtrusive, quick n dirty but effective.<br /><br />So where does that lead for the purposes of nailing down a 'rangefinder philosophy?'<br /><br />It seems I got my R4A to fill a desire for johnny-on-the-spot PJ and candids. I have a 40mm Nok for lowlight interior portraits of bands (a hobby). I don't want to use flash, if its dark I'll just up the grain. I like the 'built-in bonus' of avoiding mirrorslap and being more hand-holdable in dark pubs and clubs. I also have a Nikkor 20mm lens to use in crowds etc (scale focus) but I may yet spend up and buy a CV25 in M mount. And the rest of my pocket space is for film and filters..
|